In my last post, I said I applaud Mona Eltahawy for gaining the readership she's gained. Not only that, as explained by Altmuslimah, she got a discussion going. Not only THAT, but I hope she's paving the way for Muslim, feminist journalists and writers on the world stage. That part is only a hope so far because to do so, she can't sacrifice her identity for success. That said, she doesn't need to represent every Muslim feminist out there but selling herself out will likely only cause a barrier for anyone wanting to follow in her footsteps.
I've been thinking recently about gaining a wider readership. And by thinking, I mean thinking of trying to get to that point myself. I don't intend to go via news or publishing corporations. That's not the only way to mass communication. At least, if those corps don't come to own the entire internet, it's not. And I'd like to come at it from a community organizer's point of view, where successful mass communication isn't muddled with the attitude of "trying to make a splash" like it has been for Mona Eltahawy.
In the meantime, I don't want to get lost in Muslim feminism. There's more to me than that. I've had the fortune of growing up in country where ideas flow freely and I can't forget that side of myself. I want to be a part of that free flow of ideas and there's more to my ideas, more to ME than my Muslim and feminist ideas. I want to be a poet so I can take those pieces apart and sew them back together into my favorite outfit. And when I figure out how to be a poet, I want to know how to get people to listen. The people who need it, at least. Who wants to sit around at home in her favorite outfit?
These are big dreams considering my current readership (I appreciate each of you deeply) but I've always been a big dreamer.
To touch base with another side of myself, (but mostly to direct you to something wonderful) I recently watched the premiere episode of HBO's Girls. I had to see what all the hubbub in the female and feminist blogosphere was about. Unfortunately, I was pretty upset about it. I don't even want to talk about it. I'm not watching any more of it if I can help it. I'd rather re-watch ABG.
Topics:
2012
(1)
9/11
(10)
adventure
(1)
al-Qaeda
(2)
All American Muslim
(1)
Arab Spring
(3)
art
(6)
Awkward Black Girl
(1)
aziz ansari
(1)
Bangladesh
(4)
beauty
(1)
beliefs
(14)
Bengali
(7)
Beyonce
(1)
body
(3)
bridge
(1)
brown people
(7)
California
(1)
citizenship
(4)
Civil Rights
(4)
college dropout
(5)
community
(18)
connectedness
(8)
creativity
(10)
depression
(3)
Dr. Zakir Naek
(1)
eating disorder
(2)
empowerment
(1)
eve ensler
(1)
exercise
(1)
family
(10)
fashion
(1)
fasting
(1)
female scholars
(6)
feminism
(14)
Foucault
(1)
Fremont
(1)
fresh off the boat
(2)
friendship
(2)
growth
(4)
harem
(1)
harem pants
(1)
HBO Girls
(1)
health
(1)
heritage
(7)
hip-hop
(2)
home
(1)
honesty
(3)
humor
(2)
identity
(17)
immigrants
(2)
information
(4)
intelligence
(2)
intuition
(2)
Islam
(15)
Jay Z
(1)
jedi mind tricks
(1)
language
(2)
library
(3)
literature
(13)
love
(4)
media
(2)
medical school
(1)
mental health
(7)
mind
(3)
minority feminism
(2)
Mona Eltahawy
(3)
Muslim American
(14)
Muslim feminism
(4)
Muslim slaves
(1)
negativity
(1)
new year's resolution
(1)
New York Times
(1)
NYPD surveillance
(1)
Occupy Wall Street
(1)
Palo Alto
(1)
PeaceTV
(1)
poetry
(8)
politics
(12)
positivity
(6)
racism
(5)
Ramadan
(1)
rebellion
(5)
resilience
(6)
rules
(2)
self-development
(3)
Shahrnush Parsipur
(1)
Shahs of Sunset
(1)
Sharia
(1)
social norms
(5)
socialization
(4)
street cred
(5)
Sufi
(4)
thanksgiving
(1)
Touba and the meaning of night
(1)
traditions
(1)
travel
(1)
trust
(5)
writing
(6)
Showing posts with label street cred. Show all posts
Showing posts with label street cred. Show all posts
Friday, April 27, 2012
Wednesday, November 16, 2011
Listen up, mankind.
In feminism (if your eyes just glazed over, you are a chauvinist and you don't deserve to read what I have to say), a point that is often made to justify the discourse is that man is often equated with the universal standard, prototypical humanoid, which leaves women to be "other" because she is "not a man" and is therefore "deficient." Some claim that defining women this way is even tantamount to their non-existence.
That is one way to look at it. Another way to look at it as that using the word "man" to refers to all people is actually more harmful to men. How can you see yourself as an individual, rather than a generalization/stereotype if the word that refers to your group refers to all groups put together, as well? If everyone were divided into 1, 2, 3, and 4 and the set [1, 2, 3, 4] is called 1, it is problematic to state 2, 3, and 4 are not represented in the group's name yet fail to recognize that 1 has lost it's identity to that of the group. In this alternative way of thinking, women are both included and distinguished within the group whereas as men are inclusive and undistinguished. What can be perceived as the dominance of men can also be perceived as a hindrance to the perception of individuality just as easily as the projection of any other stereotype or bias.
I think the problem posed here is more of a problem with a desire to be indistinguishable, a mere face in the crowd. Any feminist can agree that different is not the same as deficient, so how is that leap in reasoning made? Historically, there unfortunately seems to be an answer to that question, but logically, I don't think there is. Women don't want to be treated differently than men even though they are different and men are different from them, too. And there are people who are more different or different in other ways. And I'm not just talking about sex and gender. But no, different is bad. Let's all be the same. Let's all be like heterosexual men. Commercialized identity, ftw!
But with more college educated folks who know it's wrong to think different is bad, it's cool to be different. But the problem is, most college educated folks aren't "different." They're normal and the more "normal" you are, the harder you have to try to be "different." The better you fit into the dominant culture, the more likely it is that you are impossibly indistinguishable, the more likely it is that you cultivate eccentric, local, obscure, and even distasteful tastes and habits and pointedly disregard anything adopted by "the masses." If the masses do it, they will only do it ironically. This is the result of claiming reclamation for distinctiveness that is mistaken for being downtrodden and denying it to what could be viewed as privilege but turns out not to be so. I'm not saying feminism is at fault. But it is certainly exemplary, particularly in its "western" form, in contributing to the problem.
Sunday, October 2, 2011
Learning To Draw Again
I'm going to learn to draw again.
I'll learn to look things straight in the eye
and memorize the gesture
of being seen.
I have grown too accustomed
to the pursuit of
the gaze of
privilege.
I have grown too accustomed
to seeing and not being seen.
I have grown too accustomed
to my supernatural position
as a ghost.
I'm going to learn to draw again.
I'll learn to look things straight in the eye
and internalize the gesture
of being seen.
I'll learn to look things straight in the eye
and memorize the gesture
of being seen.
I have grown too accustomed
to the pursuit of
the gaze of
privilege.
I have grown too accustomed
to seeing and not being seen.
I have grown too accustomed
to my supernatural position
as a ghost.
I'm going to learn to draw again.
I'll learn to look things straight in the eye
and internalize the gesture
of being seen.
Labels:
art,
citizenship,
community,
connectedness,
creativity,
literature,
poetry,
politics,
street cred,
trust
Sunday, August 21, 2011
The New Old Me
“We shall not cease from exploration, and the end of all our exploring will be to arrive where we started and know the place for the first time.”- TS Elliot.
In high school, I was exposed to this quote in a science class, and in that context, I interpreted it in terms of scientific exploration for the purpose of learning more about the human condition. Basically, I took it to mean that you cannot know yourself unless you know the world you live in.
With a bachelor's degree in English, I can think of at least 5 other ways to interpret this quote. Now, sitting in my high school bedroom, with a bachelor's degree in English, one of the interpretations is particularly compelling because it explains why my entire college career felt like an existential crisis.
When my mother explains my initial college dropout to her friends, she explains that Geneseo is too far away, so I couldn't endure the transition. Believing she meant I was overcome with homesickness, I disavowed her explanation, knowing there was more to it than the distance. And besides, that made me sound like a wimp. More specifically, it made me sound like the stereotypical, domestically inclined, Bengali, Muslim woman the American feminist in me adamantly resisted. Though breaking that stereotype is important to me, my resistance was not just a matter of principle. I knew that in America, the woman I aspired to be required not just competence but prowess outside the confines of domesticity.
When I graduated high school, I was confident I could achieve my desired manner of prowess. In high school I was widely known and well liked (enough to be voted class president) despite being pretty nerdy and definitely not classically popular. I was perfectly happy with the place I had cultivated for myself and believed it could be replicated in the world at large.
However, in my belief, I failed to take into account the reality of my situation. In high school, when I wasn't in school, I was always home or with my family. For me, unmonitored outside world interactions were limited to school hours and school activities, limited internet, books, TV and a handful of birthday parties my parents reluctantly gave me permission to attend. I was actually jealous when my peers started working because I felt even further behind in "real" life experience. I worked to gain experience by joining as many after school activities I could possibly interest myself in. Unfortunately, my opposition gave me a false sense of accomplishment and lead me deny my home life as a major element of my identity. It wasn't until I lived away from my family again that I understood the extent of my social impediments or their consequences.
However, in my belief, I failed to take into account the reality of my situation. In high school, when I wasn't in school, I was always home or with my family. For me, unmonitored outside world interactions were limited to school hours and school activities, limited internet, books, TV and a handful of birthday parties my parents reluctantly gave me permission to attend. I was actually jealous when my peers started working because I felt even further behind in "real" life experience. I worked to gain experience by joining as many after school activities I could possibly interest myself in. Unfortunately, my opposition gave me a false sense of accomplishment and lead me deny my home life as a major element of my identity. It wasn't until I lived away from my family again that I understood the extent of my social impediments or their consequences.
Sitting in my room today, I am not nearly as inclined to escape it as I one was. This is not because I've become complacent. Just moments ago, I realized my college years were spent in frustration and self-hatred because, after my initial failure, I was forced out of any notions of worldly experience. This lead me to question the viability of my identity and aspirations outside the sequestered world of my high school years, since they had been conceived within it. Could I still be who I happily was and follow my dreams? Or did I have to be whoever I had to be and do whatever I had to do to survive in the "real world"? Unschooled in the former and afraid of the latter, I avoided answering questions I could barely formulate and lost myself in the world I had once myopically believed to be my own.
In the world beyond my parents' house, I have learned a lot. As a teenager, I invested a lot of emotional and ideological energy against my confinement, not just to break a stereotype but again, because I didn't want to be a confined woman. That sense of rebellion became as much a part of me but so did my confinement. However, because I was in denial that my confinement defined me, I could hardly lay claim to my rebellion against it. Out in the wider world, I had to face the harsh reality that my confinement had defined me to a point of stultification in a world without forced restraints. Struggling against the identity formed in my sequestered upbringing, however, increasingly distanced me from the positive outcomes born from my confinement--my desire to grow, my sense of purpose, and my motivation.I have to accept that, no matter what happens, a part of me will always be a girl who lived a sheltered life.
Wednesday, August 3, 2011
Grapefruit
At first, I thought I was about to gain some street cred for my love of grapefruit soda. Instead, I found out 50 cent made the same mistake as my dad did when my dad was fresh off the boat. Hilarious. Ansari is awesome.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)